Back to investigations

Transparency

Freedom of information: A right delayed is a right denied

A transparency law matters only if citizens can use it without needing a public fight, an opposition MP, or sustained media attention to get basic records.

ReportedFebruary to September 20258 min file
FOIAccess to InformationDisclosurePublic Records

Share

WhatsAppPDF summary

Archive note

This file distinguishes between allegation, documented record, government response, and unresolved public-interest questions.

What is alleged

The public case

Critics say the Freedom of Information Act exists in form but falls short in practice when requests touch politically sensitive contracts, rentals, or public spending decisions.

Why it matters

Without routine access to records, every controversy gets settled by spin, not documents. That leaves citizens, journalists, and civil society permanently on the back foot.

Official response

What government says

The Prime Minister has defended the FOI framework and argued that transparency routes are available, even as critics say real-world access remains too slow and too selective.

FOI complaint over a politically sensitive lease
Government defence of the FOI process
External criticism that document access remains difficult
Ongoing public concern around selective transparency

What is documented so far

Finding 01

The rental dispute involving the Prime Minister's son turned FOI into a real-world test rather than a legal abstraction.

Finding 02

A later US-linked critique said citizens still found it difficult to obtain documents despite the existence of the law.

Finding 03

The pattern suggests a gap between legal entitlement and administrative culture.

Questions that remain

Open question 01

How many FOI requests are answered on time, in full, and without heavy redaction?

Open question 02

Which ministries are most resistant to timely disclosure?

Open question 03

Can the government publish a public FOI performance dashboard instead of arguing case by case?

Timeline

How the file unfolded

February 2025

FOI complaint lands

The lease dispute forced a public test of whether information could be obtained quickly and fully.

March 2025

Government defends the system

Officials argued that the Act provides a working route to records.

September 2025

External criticism reinforces local complaints

A US-linked report echoed long-running domestic claims about weak document access.

What you can do

The file is only as strong as the public pressure behind it

Reading this file is a start. These are the steps that keep the accountability pressure live and sharpen the public record.

Step 01

Make a FOI request today

The FOI Act is only as useful as citizens make it. File a request for any government document related to an open investigation — contracts, cabinet minutes, procurement records, financial reconciliations.

Step 02

Document your request and its outcome

If your FOI request is ignored, delayed, or refused, that outcome is itself evidence. Submit the request and response (or non-response) to this platform.

Go →

Step 03

Share this file with media and advocacy groups

FOI failure is a structural accountability issue. Sharing this file with journalists, diaspora networks, and international press-freedom monitors builds cumulative pressure for enforcement.

Step 04

Ask your MP to support FOI enforcement

Contact your area representative and ask specifically whether they support statutory enforcement mechanisms for the FOI Act with clear penalties for non-compliance.

Next action

Add to the record if you can prove more

This dossier is strongest when citizens, sources, and document holders add records that sharpen the timeline and narrow the unanswered questions.