About
Independent. Evidence-driven. In the national interest.
Unmask Antigua exists to keep the country's most important accountability fights in one public record: Alfa Nero, procurement controversies, weak oversight, broken deadlines, water failures, cost pressure, and the lived damage that follows.
None
Party affiliation
4
Core standards
Truth
Mission
Editorial method
Document first. Argue from the record.
Allegations sit beside documents, official responses, dated timelines, source links, and the public-interest questions still unanswered.
Editorial standard
Allegation is not verdict
Files distinguish between documented allegation, verified record, official response, and unresolved question. The site is confrontational, but it does not pretend uncertainty is certainty.
Editorial standard
Publish the paper trail
Every major file is expected to carry source links, date markers, and enough citation detail for a reader to inspect the record independently.
Editorial standard
National interest before party interest
The project focuses on failure, concealment, and abuse in the public sphere without slipping into cheap campaign language or unsupported accusation.
Editorial standard
Corrections stay visible
If a fact pattern changes, the file should change with it. Accountability journalism loses force the moment it starts hiding its own revisions.
Evidence tiers
Every claim carries its own label
Not everything we publish carries the same weight. Each investigation and money-trail connection is tagged with a tier so readers know exactly how strong the evidence is.
Verified
On-record: official documents, audited financial statements, court filings, or independent confirmation from two or more separate credible sources. Claims at this tier require no further qualification.
Reported
Published by a credible outlet or confirmed by a named source — but not yet independently verified by this platform. We cite the outlet, name the source where possible, and note the gap.
Alleged
A single-source claim, personal account, or unverified allegation. Every Alleged claim is clearly labelled and kept separate from confirmed findings. We publish them in the public interest when the claim is specific and the subject can respond.
Assumption
A contextual inference drawn from verified facts — a logical conclusion the record supports but does not directly state. Assumptions are signposted so readers can distinguish inference from documented fact.
Under Review
A submission or claim currently being verified. May be upgraded to Reported or Verified, or removed if it cannot be supported. Used for newly received evidence that has not yet cleared editorial review.
How tiers are set
Tiers are assigned by the editorial team and reviewed when new evidence surfaces. Submitters may self-classify; we independently verify and may reclassify before publication. A tier change is noted in the record.
Positioning
A civic watchdog archive, not a campaign machine
Alfa Nero, vehicle procurement, weak oversight, broken water promises, road defects, and household pressure all point to the same problem: public money, public promises, and public hardship stopped matching.
What stays together
Holding together the stories that are too often split apart: asset sales, procurement, utilities, public works, crime pressure, and the cost borne by households.
What gets left out
Calls to vote, unsupported accusations, personality worship, and tabloid excess that makes serious accountability easier to dismiss.